You have a desire. You notice it, dress it up in intention, and announce to yourself, “I’m going to get this thing.” That thing might be self-knowledge, a cupcake, or a partner—but whatever it is, it starts the same way: a little internal spark that insists it deserves to be satisfied.
In that sense, it’s not so hard to argue that both the murderer and the saint are running on the same fuel. Desire powers them both. The difference isn’t the presence of desire, but what happens when desire starts negotiating with itself.
Because desire rarely arrives alone. It tends to multiply, to echo, to justify itself. What begins as a simple want slowly becomes a desire to please oneself, to satisfy others, to secure a paycheck, or to live up to an ideal. At some point, desire stops pointing outward and starts looping inward—admiring its own reflection, mistaking motion for progress. And in that loop, it can drift from harmless to obsessive, and from obsessive to something far less stable.
We like to believe that more desire, applied correctly, will eventually change outcomes—that if we just want the right things hard enough, reality will bend. But history is less cooperative than that. The outcomes don’t seem to change as much as we expect; we just get better at describing them, explaining them, rebranding them.
Diseases evolve. Social categories become more complex. Racial and gender identities grow more visible and more debated, even as we try to make them more “fluid.” But perhaps they were always fluid in the way that desire is fluid—constantly shifting shape, but never actually disappearing. We rearrange the labels and call it progress, but underneath, it may still be the same pattern wearing different clothes.
And every so often, if you look closely enough, there’s a quiet, almost inconvenient reminder woven into all of it: the systems we build, the meanings we assign, the identities we refine—they may not be as solid as they appear.
In other words, the emperor still has no clothes.
He never really did.
Leave a comment